It breaks my heart when someone I admire goes along with conventional wisdom. Michael Shermers career has been one of knowing the truth and having it set his readers free. When he jumps on the dishonest Bash OWS bandwagon I must call foul.
The best treatise I’ve ever read on Libertarianism is Mind of the Market by Michael Shermer, the creator of Skeptic magazine. It is a brilliant tour-de-force of behavioral economics, business comparisons and evolutional psychology. In it he makes the best case I’ve heard for the proper relationship between markets and governments. Property rights are important, but a just and fair legislative and legal system is also needed to uphold them (I am paraphrasing!). I couldn’t agree more. It’s a lot like a Football field. We cheer and love athletic accomplishment, but the referees are a needed part of what goes on. It is an absurd suggestion to allow this kind of fast violent sport without the oversight of referees to insure that everything is conducted in a just and fair manner.
That is the proper role of government. And it has become corrupted, unfair in the application of its rules, to our detriment, very recently. The Occupy Wall Street Movement is bravely addressing this issue as I write. And it is being met by some of the snidest, unfair, and dishonest commentary that I’ve ever read coming from by the elite punditry. If this were football, I’d have to call foul and throw a flag.
And a good referee has to throw the flags not only on players he dislikes, but on players he likes. He must throw a flag on a player he likes and respects. I’ve read Mr. Sheremer’s recent column, “Occupy This” and…
Whistle blows!
Intentional Straw Man! 10 yard penalty, repeat 2nd Down!
Discussing this foul let’s examine one by one, his “points of political and economic significance”, -
1.” no one went to jail because they didn’t break any laws…If you want someone punished for the meltdown you have to first change the law.”
Oh, but people did break the law. The poorly trained “robosigners” processing mortgages were not acting on their own volition! Someone set up a systemic breaking of the law in fraudulently processing foreclosures. If you attacked it as a real criminal operation…y’know bust the lower level thugs to get their cooperation, find the mid management types who systemically hired the robosigners to break the law, and work your way up the food chain we would find a lot of villains in this crisis who deserve prison time at all levels. The DOJ has yet to do this!
2. "The only reason to work on Wall Street is to make a boatload of money. That’s the whole point of playing the market.”
The outrage is NOT directed at people playing the market and winning a boatload of money! Michael you are so much a better player than this. Hacking away at the same man of straw that pundit like Will Cain hacks away at is beneath you. It’s like Peyton Manning intentionally grounding a football. You are a better player than that and you know it.
The problem the protesters have is with the huge amounts of theft, fraud, and market manipulation that has been committed by white collar criminals over the past 15 years and they have been very clear about this point.
3.“crony capitalism, which is nothing like the libertarian vision of real capitalism”.
Here you make an important difference, but do not go far enough. You admit some sympathy to the Wall Street protesters. You are very quick to term what has been going on as crony capitalism. And you are correct!
In the mid 1990’s there were 4 banks that now have become Citigroup, there were 11 banks that have merged into what I now JP Morgan Chase, there were 13 banks that merged into what is now B of A, and there were 9 banks that merged into what is now Wells Fargo. That did not happen in a vacuum, it happened because of political corruption, gaming the legislature, and well entrenched crony capitalism. HR 1489 (reinstating Glass-Stegal –justly separating commercial and investment banks) is on the list of Occupy Wall Street demands. If you really are against crony capitalism (aka oligopolies and monopolies) why not help Occupy Wall Street instead of jump on the dishonest pundit bandwagon?
4. “Wall Street CEOs and their resident COOs, CFOs, traders, and the like, make too damn much money, hundreds of times more than the gap used to be between the highest paid and lowest paid members of corporations.”
Once again, you express some sympathy for the OWS protesters, but then ignore the fraud, theft and market manipulation behind many of these fortunes.
And there is a fundamental mistake in your challenge to “How much should the top earner earn?” It exempts the inhuman creation we call corporations. The way they game the system by using offshore tax loopholes is not insignificant. Especially seeing as how that tax burden is shifted to the rest of us.
B of A, that same B of A that wanted to charge a $5 a month Debit fee, was the recipient of a $1 Billion dollar tax rebate last year. I would want time to research a proper answer to the question of where the line of excess should be drawn. But allowing a $1 Billion dollar gift of tax money to company with the history of B of A is excessively evil, much so, than any pot smoker you ran into in New York.
5. “I agree that all competitions must be regulated by a well-defined set of rules that are consistently enforced with penalties assessed without prejudice or bias, from sporting contests to stock market trading.”
I agree too, Mr.Shermer. That’s why I had to throw the Straw Man flag on this piece. Here you do admit that you see corruption. And you admit that allowing Barry Bonds to police a steroid enhancing program while he is still playing (continuing the sports metaphors)is stupid. That is precisely what people are shouting in the streets about!
Right now we have a situation of mega trading houses that can trade worldwide 24/6. They can have multiple trading desks. They can hype one security at one desk while shorting a derivative based on that security at another desk. Which is exactly what Goldman Sachs got away with regarding mortgage securities.
When I read Mind of the Market I was very impressed. I was seeking a good example of Libertarian thought. The examples of Libertarianism to which I had been exposed were extremely poor. Well funded, think tank tested sophistry that cherry picked evidence, denied global warming, ignored the externalities in economic equations, and rationalized the pollution of our world, the potential death of our species, the return to robber baron days of economic serfdom. I knew that there had to a Libertarian out there somewhere who actually lived in the real world! And you did not disappoint with that book.
I was so impressed that I bought a Vote Libertarian bumper sticker and had in on my car during the 2008 campaign.
I saw the way Libertarianism was going shortly after the election with the ascent of Glenn Beck and what could have been a movement that ended the War On Drugs (I still maintain that the most eloquent argument against the War on Drugs I’ve ever heard was by conservative economist Milton Friedman) and reversed the Patriot Act provisions was changed into a rebranding of the policies that almost destroyed our economy.
I wound up tearing that sticker off my car and spitting on it. But I still loved that book! And I love (and quote ) Skeptic magazine. That’s why I can say that this column was not worthy of you Michael. I know that you are better player than that.!
If only you would be willing to turn your skepticism on crony capitalism instead of defending it!
No comments:
Post a Comment